30-second answer
“Governing law” and “where to sue” are different. Whether a court has jurisdiction, how process is served abroad and whether a judgment can be enforced where assets sit are separate questions. Many contracts address only the governing law.
Applied situation (illustrative)
Consider a Canadian distribution scenario: The master agreement, purchase orders and later emails point to different courts or governing laws. Identify which document controls and where any resulting decision could be enforced.
Classify the problem before calling everything “breach”
What the brand should focus on
Brands should choose dispute resolution with asset location and transaction structure in mind, not automatically default to head-office courts.
What the distributor/agent should focus on
Distributors should price the cost of foreign litigation, language, counsel, interim relief and enforcement before accepting a head-office forum.
Clauses and records to check
- Document precedence
- Governing law
- Court selection
- Service of process
- Enforcement assets
Resolve the precedence of master agreement, purchase orders and later amendments before relying on one forum clause. In Canada, start with the province and actual sales model. National distribution language alone does not resolve questions tied to local performance or franchise features.
Additional point for Canada
Identify the province, industry and real place of performance. A nationwide arrangement may still raise province-specific contract, franchise or consumer questions.
Financial exposure and response options
Budget forum and enforcement costs against the recoverable claim and the location of the counterparty’s assets.
Settlement terms worth writing down
For this Canadian arrangement, write down how document precedence, court selection and enforcement assets will be handled. Set dates and responsibilities for payment or handover, and state what happens if an agreed step is missed.